Jump to content

  •     

Photo

Not Looking For Any Workers


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
25 replies to this topic

#1 Kemal Ergenekon

Kemal Ergenekon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Locationhttp://inciswf.com/1304375737.swf

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:04 PM

Because hiring workers is unprofitable with any type of company since August 2012.

 

I want to let other players know this fact, so that they don't lose unnecessary money. This is a legitimate thread, and repetition of its deletion will result in formal tickets being issued.



#2 Magic

Magic

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • 100 posts

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:10 PM

In Q7 & sometimes Q6 it is.



#3 Kemal Ergenekon

Kemal Ergenekon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Locationhttp://inciswf.com/1304375737.swf

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:13 PM

In Q7 & sometimes Q6 it is.

Not in most countries, no.



#4 Norbengo

Norbengo

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • LocationBozeman, MT

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:19 PM

""Because hiring workers is unprofitable with any type of company since August 2012.""

 

What? I've always made profit with my workers in Q7, and people are not Turks nor idiots, no one would hire anyone in the past year if it was true...

Dunno what you guys smoke in Turkmenistan, but you're getting delusional...

 



#5 Kemal Ergenekon

Kemal Ergenekon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Locationhttp://inciswf.com/1304375737.swf

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:26 PM

@Norbengo

 

https://docs.google....U3c&usp=sharing

 

You can start crying now. Also, this is with eUS wages, and you are paying more in Servia, which means your losses are even greater. 


  • rainy sunday and ASP C SLAVA IDEY SVOBODA like this

#6 Magic

Magic

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • 100 posts

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:29 PM

Just numbers which are not proved by anything? I've been checking profits of Q7 companies for a very long time, and in Poland it's currently 425,16cc of profit per one day, but of course it is +/-100 :)



#7 Kemal Ergenekon

Kemal Ergenekon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Locationhttp://inciswf.com/1304375737.swf

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:31 PM

Just numbers which are not proved by anything? I've been checking profits of Q7 companies for a very long time, and in Poland it's currently 425,16cc of profit per one day, but of course it is +/-100 :)

 

Raw data from eUS is retrieved from eRep hourly. The calculations are pretty straightforward, but if you want my code, I can send it to you.



#8 Kemal Ergenekon

Kemal Ergenekon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Locationhttp://inciswf.com/1304375737.swf

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:32 PM

You can make your calculations for 425,16 here, so that I can show you the problem.



#9 Norbengo

Norbengo

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • LocationBozeman, MT

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:51 PM

You were always bad with numbers Turk.

 

Can you answer to one simple question?

If hiring workers is unprofitable with any type of company since August 2012... 

WHY ARE PEOPLE STILL HIRING?



#10 Kemal Ergenekon

Kemal Ergenekon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Locationhttp://inciswf.com/1304375737.swf

Posted 19 August 2013 - 11:55 PM

Because they are as clever as you are I presume.


  • ASP C SLAVA IDEY SVOBODA likes this

#11 ASP C SLAVA IDEY SVOBODA

ASP C SLAVA IDEY SVOBODA

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 21 posts

Posted 20 August 2013 - 01:25 AM

Serbs are the worst of all with numbers, I can prove it.


  • Kemal Ergenekon likes this

#12 Kucing Imut

Kucing Imut

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts
  • LocationIndonesia

Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:49 AM

You were always bad with numbers Turk.

 

Can you answer to one simple question?

If hiring workers is unprofitable with any type of company since August 2012... 

WHY ARE PEOPLE STILL HIRING?

 

because it is still profitable, for q7 weapon and rubber companies atleast


~ I want to live my eLife to the absolute fullest ~

My eRepublik Profile | Ask me a question

#13 Kemal Ergenekon

Kemal Ergenekon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Locationhttp://inciswf.com/1304375737.swf

Posted 20 August 2013 - 03:46 AM

because it is still profitable, for q7 weapon and rubber companies atleast

 

This is true for full weapons bonus countries at the moment. When you look at the great picture, this is an exceptional case, and will taper off soon.



#14 bonjik

bonjik

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 262 posts
  • LocationAtlantis

Posted 20 August 2013 - 08:02 AM

Indeed without bonuses factories are unprofitable  since the eco model is screwed and small countries cant have bonuses cause the dammed military model is also screwed and have no strategy so the bigger group will always win the war.


  • Kemal Ergenekon likes this

#15 Norbengo

Norbengo

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • LocationBozeman, MT

Posted 20 August 2013 - 11:32 AM

This is true for full weapons bonus countries at the moment. When you look at the great picture, this is an exceptional case, and will taper off soon.

So you're changing your statement after all? 

I don't know how is it in Arab economies, but it seems to me you have troubles understanding how capitalism works... 

If I start making less money from my employee work, I will lower their wages to the margin where I'm making profit again (and so will the rest of the employers on the market) so yeah, we will still make the profit and hire them, just like we did in the past year. Same goes with the low bonuses countries, except the wages are lower.

AND WE HAD PROFIT during the entire year you have mentioned. 

Your statement is simply wrong.



#16 bonjik

bonjik

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 262 posts
  • LocationAtlantis

Posted 20 August 2013 - 11:37 AM

So you're changing your statement after all? 

I don't know how is it in Arab economies, but it seems to me you have troubles understanding how capitalism works... 

If I start making less money from my employee work, I will lower their wages to the margin where I'm making profit again (and so will the rest of the employers on the market) so yeah, we will still make the profit and hire them, just like we did in the past year. Same goes with the low bonuses countries, except the wages are lower.

AND WE HAD PROFIT during the entire year you have mentioned. 

Your statement is simply wrong.

 

Your statement is simply stupid.

 

Since wages in other ecountries are higher people will just take a job in a country were its high(like china).

 

But what can you expect from a duck ?


Edited by bonjik, 20 August 2013 - 11:37 AM.

  • Kemal Ergenekon likes this

#17 Norbengo

Norbengo

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • LocationBozeman, MT

Posted 20 August 2013 - 12:03 PM

People taking jobs in China or any other country has nothing to do with this subject.

My statement is that it is still profitable to have workers, and that it was for the past year (everyone will confirm that) so that Kameel's statement is wrong (even he has changed it now)

I assume you're Kameel's buddy, but his statement is still wrong. And your comment has nothing but your butthurt shown in it.

Your butthurt amuses me, but for the next time, pls, try to use some arguments or keep quiet.



#18 Magic

Magic

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • 100 posts

Posted 20 August 2013 - 04:58 PM

Raw data from eUS is retrieved from eRep hourly. The calculations are pretty straightforward, but if you want my code, I can send it to you.

I would love to see it! My gdoc formula is avaiable here: https://docs.google....NnJzNlVBNlFtYVE, and data are auto-updating through gdoc scripts. When I'm writing this post, the value is 368,58cc with raw for 0.05cc per one, and most people buy it for 0.045cc :)



#19 Kemal Ergenekon

Kemal Ergenekon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Locationhttp://inciswf.com/1304375737.swf

Posted 20 August 2013 - 07:29 PM

Data 1: https://docs.google....SGc&usp=sharing

Data 2: https://docs.google....TUE&usp=sharing

Code: https://docs.google....dit?usp=sharing (can be loaded as a plain text file, works on Stata)



#20 Kemal Ergenekon

Kemal Ergenekon

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • Locationhttp://inciswf.com/1304375737.swf

Posted 20 August 2013 - 07:29 PM

People taking jobs in China or any other country has nothing to do with this subject.

My statement is that it is still profitable to have workers, and that it was for the past year (everyone will confirm that) so that Kameel's statement is wrong (even he has changed it now)

I assume you're Kameel's buddy, but his statement is still wrong. And your comment has nothing but your butthurt shown in it.

Your butthurt amuses me, but for the next time, pls, try to use some arguments or keep quiet.

 

The numbers don't lie Norbengo. This isn't voting on Kosovo, so you wouldn't know xdxd.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users