5 replies to this topic

[TSAKAL]

TODAY PARTY ELECTIONS ARE TAKING PLACE IN GREECE.THE PARTY THAT I FOUND AND CREATE,HAD 3 OLD MEMBERS.ONE NEW MEMBER CAME JUST THE LAST DAY THAT HE COULD BE A CUNTICATE FOR PRESIDENCY.THE DAY OF THE ELECTION 3 MORE MEMBERS JOIN THE PARTY COMPLETELY UNKNOWN TO ME AND VOTED FOR THE THE NEW CANDICATE.AS A RESULT,THEY STOLE MY MONEY,MY EFFORTS,MY IDEAS,AND STOLE MY RIGHT TO HAVE A POLITICAL ATTITUDE.I RECOMEND THE CHANGE OF LAWS ABOUT PARTIES,THE FOUNDER MUST BE THE BOSS OF ANYTHING HAPPENS IN THE PARTIE[EVERYTHING AT ALL...]STOP THIS STEELING OF GOLDS,EFFORTS AND IDEAS,OR ACCEPT THE FACT THAT YOU ARE FUN OF THE THIEFS.I HOPE THE WRIGHT EYES TO READ THIS TOPIC.

[tommot]

Have you ever tried to type without caps-lock on(even mobile's have it).

 

Maybe you should build some friend-circle that join your party when election is coming.

1 half of those friends join and vote(then leave if they want) and the other half stands by and wait for your order to come over. When it is looking like the other candidate is about to get more votes then you, you call in the other friends to put you back in the lead.

That would help in actually keeping the votes.

Those friends don't have to stay forever in your party, just for the elections.

 

this is just one of the possible tactics to counter a PTO-attempt.

[Cika Nikola96]

This game is created to be "democratic" it means: Every Citizen who have the most votes wins.

If you think that the "boss" should take all credits, this game would be North Korea, and there wouldn't be any elections at all. Dictatory.

 

You have to make some friendships, and then get involved in politics.

[TSAKAL]

please understed that i am talking about stealing my partie,not for a political moove.couldn't make their own party,if they were so desperate;why they don't make their own partie;because they don't care for politics,they only wanna steal me,is that so hard to understand it';you wan't your freedom,make your own partie,don,t steal another,is that so hard to understand that,and change the law;maybe i don't want many members,should i take someone's permicion for that;

[TSAKAL]

TODAY THE ROBBERY COMPLETED.DEMOCRACY YOU SAY;TWO JUST AND HONORABLE PEOPLE,DON'T HAVE A VOICE ANYMORE,BECAUSE THREE ROBBERS DECIDE TO STEAL THEIR HOME,INSTEAD OF MAKING THEIR OWN.I AM DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED WITH THE ADMINISTRATION THAT ALLOW THE THIEVES TO ACT LEGALLY.WHAT ARE YOU WAITING;THE NEXT STEP OF THE ROBBERS;MAYBE YOU MUST GIVE THEM A PRICE,OR MAYBE I SHOULD GIVE THEM INSTEAD OF MY PARTY,MY STORES,MY MONEY AND MY GOLD TOO.IS THAT THE GAME I PLAY THREE YEARS STRAIGHT,OR THE THIEVES HAVE TAKEN OVER THE PLACE;

[Moitaeel]

It would be interesting to have the possibility to scrutinize party affiliation from each person that wants to sign up, after all, in most countries, a party must have internal rules in order to sign up an affiliated, being able to deny it if it suits their rules. 

And it's not at all a way of controlling a party as if it was a property or a way of denying democracy, it's just a way of protecting the original alignment of a party, not allowing it to be hijacked by new entries, like a communist party becoming a far right party in a split second.

 

Even if this game doesn't have abrupt changes that would make the aligment of a party matter that much, it still has some aligment issues that are important, like an "alliance perspective", ways to spend the revenue, foreing policies relations and so on.

Edited by Moitaeel, 08 April 2014 - 09:51 AM.