Simple question, isn't it?
For some events it was tested, but don't know why it was not made permanent.
Medals And Gold Only For The Wining Side? Agree Or Not?
Started by
mun4oo
, Dec 23 2015 11:44 AM
battle hero medal
5 replies to this topic
#1
mun4oo
-
- Members
-
- 34 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 23 December 2015 - 11:44 AM
- Citizen 2806484 likes this
#2
I am The Best23
-
- Members
-
- 134 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 23 December 2015 - 03:47 PM
I kind of like the idea because it gives some more incentive to actually win the battle than to just win the BH medal. However the problem would be if a really big country attacked a really small one. Then the people in the small one won't even fight since they know they have no chance. It would be unbalanced and they will leave.
Another suggestion could be to keep the BH for both sides but the winning side gets 1 gold each for the top2-5 people in damage.
#3
Citizen 2806484
-
- Members
-
- 657 posts
Advanced Member
- Locationur mom
Posted 23 December 2015 - 11:26 PM
Crybabies with bought accounts with 100k strenght in D1 will not like this.
#4
tommot
-
- Members
-
- 1567 posts
Advanced Member
- LocationBelgium
Posted 24 December 2015 - 01:45 PM
Crybabies with bought accounts with 100k strenght in D1 will not like this.
that doesn't matter much.... no matter what you/they do, someone will always complain.
For more info, look at my wikipage
#5
Kattrrina
-
- Members
-
- 17 posts
Member
Posted 26 December 2015 - 04:25 PM
Bad idea. Small nations players are screwed enough as it is.
#6
I am The Best23
-
- Members
-
- 134 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 29 December 2015 - 02:59 AM
Maybe you do some sort of equation to help balance it with small countries where depending on how much of an underdog you are, if you win you will get more of a reward. Say if one country has like a 10% average damage advantage, then the underdog will get some kind of an extra reward if they win.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
