We all know that many games are designed to be P2W, but in the case of eRepublik is the current management strategy and game design even the best option for the company's bottom line?
Edited by gudzwabofer, 18 April 2016 - 06:43 PM.
Poll - Would You Spend Money Playing Erepublik?
Started by
gudzwabofer
, Apr 18 2016 06:41 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
gudzwabofer
-
- Members
-
- 50 posts
Advanced Member
- LocationMerry old land of Oz
#2
Internetus Internetian
-
- Members
-
- 206 posts
Advanced Member
- LocationSomalia
Posted 18 April 2016 - 06:44 PM
I AM EXTREMELY PROUD TO ANNOUNCE THAT I HAVE NEVER, IN THE ENTIRETY OF THIS GAME, IN ANY FORM OR WAY, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, DID I NEVER SPEND ANY DOLLAR OR EURO ON THIS GAME.
- gudzwabofer likes this
#3
gudzwabofer
-
- Members
-
- 50 posts
Advanced Member
- LocationMerry old land of Oz
Posted 18 April 2016 - 06:46 PM
The thing some developers don't realise is that a large amount of satisfied F2P players is an essential part of building a P2W player base.
#4
Guest_Dioist_*
Guest_Dioist_*
-
- Guests
Posted 19 April 2016 - 06:16 PM
panis
- Flaco Jimenez likes this
#5
Citizen 2806484
-
- Members
-
- 657 posts
Advanced Member
- Locationur mom
Posted 19 April 2016 - 06:41 PM
Even if they change the whole game, I don't think I will spend a cent on this game. I'm not that really interested like before the "work as manager" update. I prefer to spend some money on a real game from Steam.
#6
gudzwabofer
-
- Members
-
- 50 posts
Advanced Member
- LocationMerry old land of Oz
Posted 19 April 2016 - 10:00 PM
@LIKE A BOSS
Yeah the "significant improvements" is a bit vague I'll admit, but there does seem to be a general consensus amongst the more active players that the game has gone downhill. What form improvements would take is a whole other series of polls. For me significant improvements would be brining back more of that strategy game complexity and functionality, especially in politics and economics.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
