Jump to content

  •     

Photo

Aircraft Military Ranks And The New Battle Console


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
36 replies to this topic

#21 Zordacz

Zordacz

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 451 posts

Posted 24 July 2016 - 06:00 PM

This seems to be an easy fix, and it's been a few days. 

Your link has been queued after Q6/Q7 houses, which are coming soon.


  • MaZzA likes this

#22 trimafadzi

trimafadzi

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts

Posted 25 July 2016 - 05:00 PM

Can you add separate stats in Weekly Leaderboard that shows land battle activity versus air battle activity (both kill and influence), so I could know who are active pilots in my MU this week..


  • Trondina II likes this

#23 Citizen 2806484

Citizen 2806484

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 657 posts
  • Locationur mom

Posted 29 July 2016 - 06:29 PM

When will you tell us that Natural Enemy doesn't give bonus rank anymore?

 

 

55912f5f1a3a4bc899f43f8b51640932.png


Edited by LIKE A B0SS, 29 July 2016 - 06:30 PM.

  • plasticola likes this

screenshot-414.png


#24 Gucio

Gucio

    Advanced Member

  • Administrators
  • 822 posts

Posted 29 July 2016 - 08:05 PM

When will you tell us that Natural Enemy doesn't give bonus rank anymore?

 

 

55912f5f1a3a4bc899f43f8b51640932.png

When did the NE give rank bonus?



#25 NoOnexRO

NoOnexRO

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts

Posted 29 July 2016 - 08:15 PM

When did the NE give rank bonus?

 

It was your (eRepublik) damn wiki post.

Exactly as stated above in the picture.


  • ronnyJnrJnr likes this

Posted Image


#26 KIPPERS OF THE MUD

KIPPERS OF THE MUD

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 277 posts

Posted 29 July 2016 - 08:36 PM

Will we ever see Q6/7 houses?

Or is that abandoned?

Just like how the Aircraft module will get abandoned in a few months?

Q6/7 houses has been "soon" for 2 years now.



#27 Gucio

Gucio

    Advanced Member

  • Administrators
  • 822 posts

Posted 29 July 2016 - 09:05 PM

It was your (eRepublik) damn wiki post.

Exactly as stated above in the picture.

My question wasn't where it was stated, but at which point did you actually get NE rank bonus? Because as far as I'm aware there was never an actual bonus in-game.



#28 NoOnexRO

NoOnexRO

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts

Posted 29 July 2016 - 09:33 PM

My question wasn't where it was stated, but at which point did you actually get NE rank bonus? Because as far as I'm aware there was never an actual bonus in-game.

 

In this case why eRepublik mentioned that the NE offered a bonus in aerial fights in the wiki page?

Why is it that an official announcement is nothing more than a lie in this game?

When will you learn to do things correctly towards your players?

How much incompetence must we tolerate?


  • ronnyJnrJnr likes this

Posted Image


#29 tommot

tommot

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1567 posts
  • LocationBelgium

Posted 30 July 2016 - 08:10 AM

You do know that that was not the question..;

He simply asked when.... not where nor why!!! But when!!!

Are you able to answer that question?

 

Why is it that an official announcement is nothing more than a lie in this game?

When will you learn to do things correctly towards your players?

How much incompetence must we tolerate?

What's up with those questions???

Why start a witch-hunt if the problem can easily be fixed by answering the question???

How is trowing dirt going to solve the situation???

Have you ever tried to do something without turning it into a mud fight???  :rolleyes:


For more info, look at my wikipage


#30 NoOnexRO

NoOnexRO

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts

Posted 30 July 2016 - 04:45 PM

You do know that that was not the question..;

He simply asked when.... not where nor why!!! But when!!!

Are you able to answer that question?

 

What's up with those questions???

Why start a witch-hunt if the problem can easily be fixed by answering the question???

How is trowing dirt going to solve the situation???

Have you ever tried to do something without turning it into a mud fight???  :rolleyes:

 

tommot, I don't like when a question is answered with another question, especially when it's about an official eRepublik statement.

It was written in the wiki page so someone wrote it there. Someone who knew WHAT to write. And unfortunately it was wrong - as we can see after a few days.

And when someone from eRepublik writes that NE applies to aerial fights THAT is the moment when you consider that NE is applied to aerial fights.

Especially because it was said "unlike in the battle grounds".

So asking ME when the NE was applied is not the answer I am waiting.

I am waiting an answer on why was written THAT and 7 days later someone changed the text and stated exactly the opposite.

So yeah, I feel either I, as a player, am treated like a stupid player or... someone in eRepublik staff is incompetent and like usual this is swiped under the rug.

It is my right to offer my feedback on something that happened.

And incompetence isn't throwing mud on someone... it's just plain truth and simple observation.

Anything else, tommot? Because your intervention was definitely NOT on the subject I tried to point out.

Defending mistakes is not the way things should be addressed.

A simple "we are sorry for the situation created" would have been enough... (hmmm... would have?)

 

Just to be really on the subject:

 

http://wiki.erepubli...ev&oldid=712797

 

cddd378a34.jpg


Edited by NoOnexRO, 30 July 2016 - 05:03 PM.

  • ronnyJnrJnr, plasticola and Baznr like this

Posted Image


#31 tommot

tommot

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1567 posts
  • LocationBelgium

Posted 30 July 2016 - 08:30 PM

I am waiting an answer on why was written THAT and 7 days later someone changed the text and stated exactly the opposite.

So yeah, I feel either I, as a player, am treated like a stupid player or... someone in eRepublik staff is incompetent and like usual this is swiped under the rug.

It is my right to offer my feedback on something that happened.

wait.... you point out a problem.... and later on they fix it <----they fixed a mistake!!!! :o how horrible!!!  :rolleyes:

 

soooo..... why do you complain? Is it because they didn't inform you that they will fix the problem... or is it because they didn't send you a thank you note for pointing it out?


For more info, look at my wikipage


#32 NoOnexRO

NoOnexRO

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts

Posted 30 July 2016 - 10:00 PM

wait.... you point out a problem.... and later on they fix it <----they fixed a mistake!!!! :o how horrible!!!  :rolleyes:

 

soooo..... why do you complain? Is it because they didn't inform you that they will fix the problem... or is it because they didn't send you a thank you note for pointing it out?

 

A mistake is fixed within hours or minutes.

Something like: "hey, we wrote there wrong, let's correct it so there won't be any problems".

7 days later... is incompetence - no matter what you say, tommot.


  • ronnyJnrJnr and plasticola like this

Posted Image


#33 tommot

tommot

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1567 posts
  • LocationBelgium

Posted 30 July 2016 - 11:22 PM

A mistake is fixed within hours or minutes.

Something like: "hey, we wrote there wrong, let's correct it so there won't be any problems".

7 days later... is incompetence - no matter what you say, tommot.

So.. you are saying that they have to drop everything they are doing simply because you noticed a problem and expect this to be settled instantly.

You just pointed out that you consider the info on the wiki to be of greater importance then a bug problem in the game.

You don't know how they do there job, so you automatically assume they are incompetent.

You assume that the problem will be fixed within just a few hours after the report was filed not even taking in to count that there are other matters  importance at that very moment.


For more info, look at my wikipage


#34 Yui MHCP001

Yui MHCP001

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts

Posted 31 July 2016 - 01:03 AM

Look, the fact of the matter is, this is a mistake. People make mistakes, shit happens. But the amount of time it took to fix it is the incompetence.

 

I'm sure that this announcement passed through a couple of hands, and if it did, it's a wonder how no one found the mistake before it was published, and not until 7 days after it was published that it was found and/or fixed. 

 

And Gucio, you know I love you baby (whether you like it or not xp), but your posts make it seem (and I'm sure you didn't intend this) that you're sort of shifting blame to us for being upset. It shouldn't be up to us to point out eRepublik's mistakes, especially one like this, where the rank bonus would be barely noticeable (if at all) with no Perception. 



#35 MaZzA

MaZzA

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 145 posts
  • LocationHoly Theocratic Nation

Posted 01 August 2016 - 02:53 PM

When did the NE give rank bonus?

 

For aircraft battle or for the normal ones ?

 

For the normal battle I'm sure in the 2011 fighting against natural enemy gave 10% rank.


210402-1.png


#36 Thedillpickl

Thedillpickl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts
  • Locationkitchen

Posted 04 August 2016 - 07:49 PM

Man...
This is the latest information? lmao

I mean the reason I come to the forum is that occasionally I pick up something from a post that will help me. Nevermind.
  • ronnyJnrJnr likes this

#37 Yarpen

Yarpen

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 07 August 2016 - 03:44 PM

Some comments/suggestions from usability perspective:
- the Battle console buttons are located at the top of battle field - when you open console - they are moved down - while they should remain at the top

- name of a current tab (ex. Fighter Statistics) could be moved to left side

- pressing the button for section (tab) which is already open (ex. Fighter Statistics) - should CLOSE the console instead or reloding 

- CLOSE button could be removed then

57a756dfda26e.png






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users