Jump to content

  •     

Photo

Why Do Plato Endorse Stupid Articles?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
1 reply to this topic

#1 Releasethe Krakken

Releasethe Krakken

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts
  • LocationSouth of the clouds and north of the wind

Posted 09 August 2016 - 12:32 PM

https://www.erepubli...ws-2601138/1/20

 

boring interview article. who teh vark cares about this drivel.

 

https://www.erepubli...rs-2600983/1/20

 

wowie another article about the resource wars that nobody but spaniards can understand

 

https://www.erepubli...r--2601319/1/20

 

guy claimed to have met bonte (yawns) buttkisses erep and plato gets endorsement??????

 

really it shows literary prowess.

 

apparently plato enjoys articles that kisses his own ass.

 

http://www.erepublik...n--2601537/1/20

 

romanian writes run of the mill article about the resource wars and gets a gold endorsement

 

 

http://www.erepublik...ps-2601570/1/20

 

a borefest - i wonder if 20% of the people voting and endorsing it really read that yawn.  no penmanship shown just a boring account of eHistory not even worth the endorsements it got.

 

http://www.erepublik...me-2601648/1/20

 

defaces art classics - plato thinks its funny and endorses him tut tut.

 

-----

 

none of these articles even intrigued me.  so please explain on what basis do you endorse articles.  apparently intelligence is not a criteria.

 

 

 

 

 


mh4l.png

 


#2 Gucio

Gucio

    Advanced Member

  • Administrators
  • 822 posts

Posted 09 August 2016 - 07:50 PM

We appreciate your feedback, but we're currently not looking for any members to join community team who takes the decisions about endorsing articles. I'll let you know once we do need someone else.

 

In the meanwhile, you can find more details as of what Plato is looking for here: https://forum.erepub...ments-by-plato/


  • eclank likes this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users