4 replies to this topic

[Mitsou]

Dear developers and players,

 

please let me suggest a mayor change in the MPP rules.

 

How does it works now:

If country 'A' attack country 'B', and if both ('A' and 'B') country have MPP with country 'C', then the attacker ('A') will lose this MPP. 

As I experience this is restricting more than one way the countries and force the fronts to stall or don't even attack for years. Nobody have the curage to attack beacuse they are affraid of losing MPPs. This determines that the attacker have a mayor disadvanatge.

 

 

Suggestion v1: Attacker and defender side both keep the MPP, and let the country 'C' decide from 3 possibilities:

- support country 'A'
- support country 'B'
- stay neutral
The citizens still can travel if they have other oppinions than the leaders.

 

 

Suggestion v2: Let the citizens decide which side they want to support via MPP.

 

 

 

Please share your oppinions and ideas about this.

Edited by Mitsou, 01 July 2017 - 07:11 PM.

[Citizen 2806484]

Players warned them even after the Work as manager update, but they continued to do shit. 

[Jarlaxle]

Agreed