3 replies to this topic

[JohnCV]

Hi,

 

For years there is not much dynamic in the terms of party member numbers, sending every elections the same parties/people in the government. This also become a major factor of inactivity for medium/small parties. Not many new players to recruit from. By removing the actual conditioning of being in top 5 parties according to member count, you will make the political module more dynamic, more fair to everyone and also bring some new life to those willing to give a second chance to this module but couldn't, just because they can't get members. Set a percentage target to accede in the government after the voting, let's say 5% and give everybody a chance!  

[Preciousbox]

I also agree with the abolition of the 5 first parties. 

It is unfair for the rest of the parties and not at all democratic .

Political space is not rehearsing.

Parties must also be protected from pto.

Election results must appear after the end of the election!

Edited by Preciousbox, 26 June 2019 - 05:35 AM.

[Web Carioca]

The first five parties are chosen by the number of members. Perhaps it would be more fair and give more motivation in the political field, if the classification was through the weighted average of the number of members and the presence of votes in the elections for party president.