82 replies to this topic

[Sexagenarian]

Falklands were British before Argentina existed

[Gordito Simpaticon]

british are pirates before pirates existed.

[TortaFrita]

ISLAS MALVINAS PATRIA ARGENTINA

[CheetahCurtis]

british are pirates before pirates existed.

 

Argentina's logic is fail logic. Pirates can't exist before pirates existed.

[Tenshou]

[Rona1d]

Add eCuba x2

[Di Carlo]

Falklands were British before Argentina existed

False...

[Hernu]

british are pirates before pirates existed.

 

+10000

[Encore]

Falklands were British before Argentina existed

 

 

The English government proclaimed in the UN, that the malvinas are British, because they have since 1833 ... thus ....
Argentina exists as such since 1810 (formally from 1816)

Edited by Encore, 14 August 2013 - 07:30 AM.

[Bohemond4]

and your point Encore? The Islanders want to be British, their opinion is the only one which actually is worth anything...self-determination and all that.

[Encore]

and your point Encore? The Islanders want to be British, their opinion is the only one which actually is worth anything...self-determination and all that.

 

 

is a response to another user

Answering your post, you can not talk about self determination, when a population is implanted by another country

As tomorrow 1 million Argentines relocate to London and we self proclaim that land owners ..... English Logic.

 

 

My english suck XD

[Viridi]

[Bohemond4]

Then I guess the government of Argentina is illegal because they are Spanish descendants

[Moss King]

Since the people that live on Falklands want to belong to the British and not Argentina I don't really understand how Argentina thinks they could claim Falklands (On 10 and 11 March 2013, the Falkland Islands held a referendum over its political status, and voters favoured (99.8%) remaining under British rule.). If they could claim it what would they do with the people living there? Ship away everyone except the 2 guys that want to belong to Argentina?

[stancel]

Shameful:

 

 

So if Argentina can have Falklands (Despite 99.8% of people there voting to remain in the UK) then maybe US can claim Bermuda. Because apparently it being close to Argentina is the only real reason that Argentina has to claim the Falklands. So I guess all the countries in the Americas should claim whatever British territory is closest to them, against the wishes of the people living there.

[pacifyer]

Since the people that live on Falklands want to belong to the British and not Argentina I don't really understand how Argentina thinks they could claim Falklands (On 10 and 11 March 2013, the Falkland Islands held a referendum over its political status, and voters favoured (99.8%) remaining under British rule.). If they could claim it what would they do with the people living there? Ship away everyone except the 2 guys that want to belong to Argentina?

 

 

Most people who lives there ARE brits, or their descendants!

[Kami Carmine]

YAY LET'S FIGHT OVER RL THINGS THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS

[Henry Pfeiffer Arundel]

Most people who lives there ARE brits, or their descendants!

 

What is your point? They've been there for generations at this point. You're going to foist your government on them because why? You want to?

 

SMELL THE HYPOCRISY, ARGIES

[pacifyer]

¿Cuál es tu punto? Han estado allí durante generaciones en este punto. Usted va a imponer su gobierno sobre ellos porque ¿por qué? ¿Quieres?

 

SMELL THE HYPOCRISY, ARGIES

 

 

There are no ACTUAL native population there. Malvinas are BRITISH COLONIES. The original native inhabitants WERE EXPELLED by the current ones. Colonies must dissapear, and UN is working towards that:

http://www.un.org/en/decolonization/

 

http://www.un.org/en...rritories.shtml

[Viridi]

I'm fairly sure there weren't any 'natives'. If I remember correctly the french landed there and established a colony, becoming the first people to actually inhabit the island. There are artefacts of people having previously been there [arrowheads and stuff] but no buildings have been found.

 

Your claim that the British booted off the previous 'natives' could be interpreted to mean we kicked out the Americans in 1833 or the Argentinians in 1982, but not that we kicked out any people who lived in the modern day country of Argentina before this time.