xD?
Who Came First The Chicken Or The Egg
#1
Posted 14 August 2013 - 09:20 AM
A bold Shqiptar fears only God.
#3
Posted 14 August 2013 - 09:24 AM
Since the life started in the oceans and fish lay eggs I guess you can figure it out yourself.
#4
Posted 14 August 2013 - 09:28 AM
I came first. I just like to fap a lot.
#5
Posted 14 August 2013 - 09:48 AM
It is the egg. Whichever way you consider the question.
Eggs were around long before the first chicken was ever around.
Evolution created the chicken. Whatever laid the egg which contained the first chicken was not directly a chicken; so the egg which the first chicken was inside came before the chicken.
Egg in both cases.
#6
Posted 14 August 2013 - 09:57 AM
The theory of evolution states that species change over time via mutation and sexual reproduction. Since DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) can be modified only before birth, it can be argued that a mutation must have taken place at conception or within an egg such that a creature similar to a chicken, but not a chicken, laid the first chicken eggs. These eggs then hatched into chickens that inbred to produce a living population. Hence, in this light, both the chicken and the structure of its egg evolved simultaneously from birds that, while not of the same exact species, gradually became more and more like present-day chickens over time.
However, no one mutation in one individual can be considered as constituting a new species. A speciation event involves the separation of one population from its parent population, so that interbreeding ceases; this is the process whereby domesticated animals are genetically separated from their wild forebears. The whole separated group can then be recognized as a new species.
The modern chicken was believed to have descended from another closely related species of birds, the red junglefowl, but recently discovered genetic evidence suggests that the modern domestic chicken is a hybrid descendant of both the red junglefowl and the grey junglefowl. Assuming the evidence bears out, a hybrid is a compelling scenario that the chicken egg, based on the second definition, came before the chicken.
This implies that the egg existed before the chicken, but that the chicken egg did not exist until an arbitrary threshold was crossed that differentiates a modern chicken from its ancestors. Even if such a threshold could be defined, an observer would be unlikely to identify that the threshold had been crossed until the first chicken had been hatched and hence the first chicken egg could not be identified as such.
A simple view is that at whatever point the threshold was crossed and the first chicken was hatched, it had to hatch from an egg. The type of bird that laid that egg, by definition, was on the other side of the threshold and therefore not a chicken—it may be viewed as a proto-chicken or ancestral chicken of some sort, from which a genetic variation or mutation occurred that resulted in the egg being laid containing the embryo of the first chicken. In this light, the argument is settled and the egg had to have come first.
Edited by Bond Guevara, 14 August 2013 - 09:57 AM.
Our life is like a white paper in a book
Only us who can decide to write it with good ink or bad ink
#7
Posted 14 August 2013 - 10:30 AM
The theory of evolution states that species change over time via mutation and sexual reproduction. Since DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) can be modified only before birth, it can be argued that a mutation must have taken place at conception or within an egg such that a creature similar to a chicken, but not a chicken, laid the first chicken eggs. These eggs then hatched into chickens that inbred to produce a living population. Hence, in this light, both the chicken and the structure of its egg evolved simultaneously from birds that, while not of the same exact species, gradually became more and more like present-day chickens over time.
However, no one mutation in one individual can be considered as constituting a new species. A speciation event involves the separation of one population from its parent population, so that interbreeding ceases; this is the process whereby domesticated animals are genetically separated from their wild forebears. The whole separated group can then be recognized as a new species.
The modern chicken was believed to have descended from another closely related species of birds, the red junglefowl, but recently discovered genetic evidence suggests that the modern domestic chicken is a hybrid descendant of both the red junglefowl and the grey junglefowl. Assuming the evidence bears out, a hybrid is a compelling scenario that the chicken egg, based on the second definition, came before the chicken.
This implies that the egg existed before the chicken, but that the chicken egg did not exist until an arbitrary threshold was crossed that differentiates a modern chicken from its ancestors. Even if such a threshold could be defined, an observer would be unlikely to identify that the threshold had been crossed until the first chicken had been hatched and hence the first chicken egg could not be identified as such.
A simple view is that at whatever point the threshold was crossed and the first chicken was hatched, it had to hatch from an egg. The type of bird that laid that egg, by definition, was on the other side of the threshold and therefore not a chicken—it may be viewed as a proto-chicken or ancestral chicken of some sort, from which a genetic variation or mutation occurred that resulted in the egg being laid containing the embryo of the first chicken. In this light, the argument is settled and the egg had to have come first.
SOURCE: WIKIPEDIA
#9
Posted 14 August 2013 - 11:44 AM
egg
Check out my newspaper The Maine Frontier. http://www.erepublik...by-2304887/1/20
#10
Posted 14 August 2013 - 12:01 PM
The dickhead
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
#11
Posted 14 August 2013 - 12:32 PM
I came again. Thanks to xtasia's pic.
#13
Posted 14 August 2013 - 01:35 PM
The chicken because God made things in alphabetical order.
heh!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users