Jump to content

  •     

Photo

Joining Party Should Not Be Automatic


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Gaius Aquila

Gaius Aquila

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts
  • LocationHungary

Posted 21 February 2014 - 10:07 AM

Hi!

 

My suggestion is that there should be a possibility for the party president and maybe other officials inside to not to accept applicants for the party. Players would first need to apply, but party president could decide if player can join or not, to the party. Party presidents should also have right to kick out players from the party.

 

Please install these as an update. In real world it works the same..

 

Thank you!



#2 Nilroe

Nilroe

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Locationvalencia, spain

Posted 22 February 2014 - 06:46 AM

This is a great idea in order to have control of partys and have less risk of TakeOvers


Duque de Aosta, Oporto y Normandia, Marques de Viseu y Linares, SeƱor de Saboya.
 

#3 Dibex

Dibex

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 85 posts
  • LocationItaly

Posted 22 February 2014 - 12:08 PM

This is a great idea in order to have control of partys and have less risk of TakeOvers


7251613-1.png


#4 tommot

tommot

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1567 posts
  • LocationBelgium

Posted 22 February 2014 - 01:13 PM

This idea places even more power in 1 players hands(party president).

The PP already has more then enough power at it's disposal.

 

An alternative would be to let it's members vote on the acceptance of the new member using the same system as the CP/PP elections but internal only(for party-members only).


For more info, look at my wikipage


#5 Callumh123

Callumh123

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 22 posts

Posted 24 February 2014 - 01:54 PM

This idea places even more power in 1 players hands(party president).

The PP already has more then enough power at it's disposal.

 

An alternative would be to let it's members vote on the acceptance of the new member using the same system as the CP/PP elections but internal only(for party-members only).

 

Agreed with up to the point of your alternative argument. That would seem incredibly counter-productive and intangible. 


  • tommot likes this

Tim_Holtz: "ill rename it the White Pride Party"


#6 tommot

tommot

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1567 posts
  • LocationBelgium

Posted 24 February 2014 - 06:50 PM

Agreed with up to the point of your alternative argument. That would seem incredibly counter-productive and intangible. 

True, but still a better alternative then the one-man-decide-all approach.

 

Still need to apply and wait to be accepted, but....

Why not limit the ability to a few people(as it is in a MU - commander and/or second commander can kick-out or accept members).

Who these people would be... i don't know.

But the load will not fall all on the PP alone, others would get a say.


For more info, look at my wikipage





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users