31 replies to this topic

[Demonaire]

What you have in mind is a military feature.

This is an economical matter.

And think about it, 10% isn't that bad of a number for a region that isn't your own.

 

It's a military feature with an economical matter in it. And better than a 10% is a 20% with regions interconnected with a air bridge.

[realjjj]

Whatever the effect of the change, it would be greater if the distant regions can add up to a max of 20% for each res so why not?

This will create more wars, make big nations stronger and harm small nations but the effects are greatly muted if the distant regions can't add up.

 

PS: At no point here I am not saying that the changes are positive for the game, that's obviously not the case.

The only asset this game has is that it banks on patriotism/nationalism/xenofobia, w/e you want to call it. Differences in productivity are leading to mass migration and a dilution of that main asset.

Differences in productivity also harm small nations and favor big nations in a disproportionate way from an economic point of view.

In the old days  it was much better, with a few iron regions fueling the wars but overall there wasn't this insane unbalance between big and smaller countries.

If you wanted a better game, you would get rid of differences in productivity ,allow everybody to go home and find a less harmful way to fuel wars.

 

The core mechanic here won't change. 2 or 10 distant regions with the same resource will still be 10%. Just like it was now with 20% bonus.

 

[Bond Guevara]

Another panic move from the devs regarding the loss of player since v2.

[tommot]

It's a military feature with an economical matter in it. And better than a 10% is a 20% with regions interconnected with a air bridge.

No, it is an economical feature as it directly affects the market and the nations income. The military is only involved when there is battle going on in such regions

Whatever the effect of the change, it would be greater if the distant regions can add up to a max of 20% for each res so why not?

This will create more wars, make big nations stronger and harm small nations but the effects are greatly muted if the distant regions can't add up.

Oh, boy...you all act more greedy then Plato.

So what it is not 20%. It is still a hell of a lot more then you get then if this change was not implemented. 

[Demonaire]

No, it is an economical feature as it directly affects the market and the nations income. The military is only involved when there is battle going on in such regions

 

If it have bonus involved, then it have an economical feature.

[Rusto]

So boring.

[maxicasas]

Nice change

[Jack Lantos]

This will continue to make smaller countries perm-wiped, and the players there will have to quit. Does Plato know he loses 1/3 players every year?

[Finway Divi Filius]

 

&

 

[Kaad]

Small countries will enjoy perma wipe for ever; their citizens will leave the game and you will see empty country which even PTOers will never wants to join...

[bozbo]

when this feature will be implemented?

Edited by bozbo, 03 June 2014 - 08:17 AM.

[Petsku]

when this feature will be implemented?

It's live now!

 

We're looking into one specific issue where Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) doesn't have one region listed in the Economy page. Other than that, everything should be in place!